but "pain" ? hell yes !
I dont think wanting th team to do its utmost best anything "poetical" !
-------------
ahhhhhh
the good old "winning record" argument !perhaps you can refer to my post in general forum in "branoo & zagrb thread"
what winning record?
GN has even a BETTER winning record than branko.
anyone wants to look at the QUALITY of the opposition before touting records and wins ?
I think they ought to.
------------
"chemistry" ?
need I remind you of the rahman-badavi "chemistry" ?
or karimi-daei chemistry? or karimi misbehaving or ...... etc.
I didnt think so

-------------
ummm.... GN's mexico is equal to branko's mexico game?
I may be getting old, but I dont remember seeing : daei, VH, rezaei, mirza, kia, teymoorian, zandi, ..... in GN's game. one had 3-4 training sessions. the other had a month's .
did you?
-----------
no we couldnt have done what we did to bahrain to mexico.
but I definitely expect what we did to bahrain, TO BAHRAIN after a couple of months , with a better team ( VH and zandi and ... ).
-------------
branko's moronic attitude and lajbaazi came to the fore at the WC for those who either closed their eyes , denied reality or just were blind:
a team with no physical fitness program and trainer is as good as a lame sitting duck at the WC.
I call such a coach an idiot.
----------------
na bahram jan. if there was indeed any HYPING it was done by him and his staff.
yes, human included.
the ppl who for more than a year kept refusing to acknowledge the team's left side was a disaster. or the defense really was sub par.
hell I had ( until a while ago ) a picture of the poll in F+ citing weaknesses of TM that we'd like changed.
out of all the members who voted for various areas such as defense, left wing, strikers, GK .... only two ppl voted for the option: "No. TM has NO weak points" !!
one was human !
and it was NOT only for "show", as the staff ( starting form the head coach) , really believed the team didnt have any weak points.
once a person refuses to see a weak point, he will NEVER act to rectify it.
and that's what happened.
sub par coach w sub par staff results in sub par results.
as simple as 2+2=4

)
...............
Leave a comment: