USA vs Serbia basketball game right now is neck and neck
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2024 Summer Olympics & Paralympics Thread
Collapse
X
-
i still think total medals is more important, and the golds can be tie breaker. It sorta discounts the silver and bronze winners to put so much emphasis on gold.Originally posted by PSGman#19 View Post
The official ranking is the gold medals
Either way you look at it, we are doing pretty well for a country run by shaved apes.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Agree - I hate how 1 gold is worth 200 silvers lmaoOriginally posted by diz View Post
i still think total medals is more important, and the golds can be tie breaker. It sorta discounts the silver and bronze winners to put so much emphasis on gold.
Either way you look at it, we are doing pretty well for a country run by shaved apes.
Please watch and Subscribe:
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Who cares about these which nation comes first. Put in Sanda in the Mix and we are guaranteed 6 golds every year. Let women participate fully and whatever we get in our strong fields double the digits automatically. If the ultra corrupt IOC put in ten weight classes each in wrestling even the better.
Then we have to ask ourselves, is olympic as a whole anything worth caring for? Who gives a crap about BMX, sailing, aristocratic notions of what horse riding is. Hell if IOC had some spine maybe even SARDAR AZMOUN would be olympic medalist.
Just my two cents.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
use to be they would first look at the gold, now it’s medals and I don’t think it’s fair. They should make it a weighted average, with maybe 3 points for gold, 2 points for silver and one for bronzeOriginally posted by diz View Post
total medals we are 23.
gold medals we are 20.
just depends on which you think is more important.
“It is easier to fool the people, than to convince them they have been fooled." - Mark Twain
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I agree. While it is fine to get the best ranking in medal table I also find it useless to be obsessed with that.Originally posted by AGC View PostWho cares about these which nation comes first. Put in Sanda in the Mix and we are guaranteed 6 golds every year. Let women participate fully and whatever we get in our strong fields double the digits automatically. If the ultra corrupt IOC put in ten weight classes each in wrestling even the better.
Then we have to ask ourselves, is olympic as a whole anything worth caring for? Who gives a crap about BMX, sailing, aristocratic notions of what horse riding is. Hell if IOC had some spine maybe even SARDAR AZMOUN would be olympic medalist.
Just my two cents.
First only top 5/10 are really visible, the rest are in the shadow and are just for childish comparison between non top countries (like israel 6 medals mocks iran, Lebanon... 0 medals last week).
For top countries I also find ridiculous as minor sports are just there to try to get medals and will be forgotten/neglected in 3 days. Also note the hypocrisy/ ugly opportunists about nationality change as said before.
Is it better to have more medals, reduced to limited and somehow not mainstream sports, or have less medals and be present in many sports, specially in the more visible one?
Turkey has less medals than us and a worse ratio medalist/athletes. But each time I watch Olympics I see them in a lot of sports
- Likes 2
Comment
Users Viewing This Topic
Collapse
There are 0 users viewing this topic.
footer ad
Collapse



Comment