UCL FINAL: MANCHESTER UNITED v CHELSEA : MATCH DISCUSSION,[All VIDEOS ADDED 1st POST]

[1Heesham1]

WTF is that supposed to be? He's just talking to him.

yeh and calling him a fvcking cuunt.

From a neutral view, that was one hell of a game. Ref. was absolute sh1t. Great game, and a very nerve rackng pk shootout. congrats to man u fans.

Yeh i agree... he kept giving fouls for peanuts.

[Ghormeh Sabzi]

From a neutral view, that was one hell of a game. Ref. was absolute sh1t. Great game, and a very nerve rackng pk shootout. congrats to man u fans.

[Pali]

Chelsea fans are over the moon at completing an unprecedented quadruple:

Runners up in the Charity Shield
Runners up in the Carling Cup
Runners up in the Premiership
Runners up in the Champions League

[Mr Pouya]

terry is a filthy bastard and i'm glad it was him who missed

once a scumbag always a scumbag

[Pharaoh]

WTF is that supposed to be? He's just talking to him.

And blowing his nose on him.

[Pharaoh]

I did not make this pic btw

LOL was just coming here to post that

[Lazio]

WTF is that supposed to be? He's just talking to him.

[1Heesham1]

terry is a filthy bastard and i'm glad it was him who missed

[Lazio]

Most painful football experience of my life after Iran - Ireland. Such a shame for Terry, I really feel for him. He gave it his everything this season and he's been fantastic and it's such a shame for him to miss a penalty because of a slip.
To those who say ManU had a better game, it was a very even game, if anything, Chelsea had way more chances (shots on goal, free kicks, crossbar). But in the end it had to be Penalties and basically a coinflip.
Oh well, if anything good comes out of this, hopefully Grant will be replaced. He should've brought Sheva on for Drogba in extra time, he was invisible from the second half onwards apart from the shot that hit the post. And Kalou should've started instead of Malouda.

[Mr Pouya]

[Pali]

I did not make this pic btw

lol nice one..Best day of my life, along with 99' of course

[Suprah]

Smirnoff are bringing out a John Terry vodka, bottled in Russia.

I did not make this pic btw

[Suprah]

agreed, who said i disagree?? (except for the carrick handball penalty which i think was a correct decision)
all i want is man utd fans give credit where its due and not claim chelsea's goal was fluky and accept the fact that this game, luck was on man utd side but credit to man utd for making use of it. afterall, fortune favours the brave
and yea, the 1999 final, again that game, the opponent(WE) hit ur post twice but in the end and we were the better side, but u guys won! so yessss..im still pissed and will always be!!!

You cant get luck on your sides until you are brave enough to look it in the eye and challenge it I think it was just destiny for us in 1999 CL final to win on what was Sir Matt Busby's 90th birthday. Same in 1968 after 10 years of Munich air crash, and now 2008 after 50 years of the tragedy

I feel sorry, and feel giggly , for Ballack though, he has become "Mr Runners Up" way too much (Bayer in 2002, Germany in WC2002, Chelsea in 2007 and 2008)

[yashar_fasihnia]

Still bitter about 1999 huh ?
If it was bad luck, then Chelsea had it coming having been through a CL campaign where they faced such mighty sides as Schalke and Rosenborg and this season's over acheivers Fenerbahche (like Monaco of 2003/04), before finally getting tested against Liverpool in the semis - and a LUCKY own goal by Riise just to put emphasis on luck. While United had to deal with Roma 4 times, Lyon and Barcelona to reach the final.
Also, Chelsea were riding their share of luck this season - cant believe how THAT was a penalty on some dodgy handball call on Carrick at Stamford Bridge when Ballack stepped up and scored the winner against us to slash the gap. Yes poor luck meant that hitting the wood twice costed them goals, but were Chelsea the better side throughout for 120 minutes ? No. It was a game of two halves. United should have been 3-0 up before a pin-ball machine deflections and a slip from Van Der Sar allowed Lampard to get a goal. Same with Chelsea, Drogba's ambitious shot could have made the difference, and Lampard's shot could have also, and Terry's miss in the penalties could have won the Cup for them.
But sooner or later your luck runs out.
Tough luck, we faced the same damn bad luck in 2005 FA Cup final against Arsenal where we hit the wood god knows how many times for 120 minutes - and Arsenal's first shot on target was a lame freekick straight at Roy Carroll by Van Persie in 2nd half of extra time, only to finally lose in penalties via just a missed kick by Scholes.
Shit happens, otherwise there is no fun or unpredictibility or lessons learned in life.

agreed, who said i disagree?? (except for the carrick handball penalty which i think was a correct decision)

all i want is man utd fans give credit where its due and not claim chelsea's goal was fluky and accept the fact that this game, luck was on man utd side but credit to man utd for making use of it. afterall, fortune favours the brave

and yea, the 1999 final, again that game, the opponent(WE) hit ur post twice but in the end and we were the better side, but u guys won! so yessss..im still pissed and will always be!!!