Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Two strategic mistakes by Daei in Saudi’s game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • zzgloo
    replied
    ارتباط با ما آرشیو خانه نسخه Pdf ورزش - عربستان به ایران درس فوتبال داد مهدی زعیم*زاده:به نظر می*رسد گل جواد نكونام و فرار از شكست در ریاض باعث شده تا خیلی*ها فراموش كنند ایران در نیمه اول بازی مقابل عربستان چه نمایش پراشكال و ناامیدكننده*ای ارائه كرد. باید پذیرفت در مصاف دو تیم مدعی قاره آسیا، عربستان به مراتب بهتر بازی كرد و اگر قرار بود انصاف در ریاض رعایت شود هر سه امتیاز بازی به میزبان می*رسید. بی*دقتی مهاجمان عربستان و داور مسابقه موجب شد تا این تیم مزد بازی خوب و باكیفیت خود را به*طور كامل نگیرد وگرنه آنها نیمه اول را با بیش از یك گل به پایان می*بردند، اما ایران در روزی كه خوش*شانس بود تنها یك گل دریافت كرد تا در نیمه دوم به لطف عقب*نشینی و افت عربستان با فرصت*شناسی مناسب نكونام از شكست فرار كند و با یك امتیاز به خانه بازگردد. ورای این نتیجه مطلوب اگر یك*بار دیگر بازی شنبه*شب آنالیز شود بعید است كسی به ایران نمره قبولی بدهد. بازیكنان عربستان در اكثر دقایق بازی به ویژه در نیمه اول به نحوی بازی كردند كه ما همیشه آرزو می*كنیم تیم*ملی كشورمان این*گونه بازی كند. بازی تك*ضرب و پاسكاری*های دقیق روی زمین آنها تحسین*برانگیز بود و آنها به لطف همین بازی خوب شان چهار، پنج موقعیت مسلم گل پیدا كردند و حتی در نیمه دوم هم یكی، دوبار به*طور جدی دروازه ایران را تهدید كردند، اما در آن*سو موقعیت*های خطرناك ایران كه بسیار كمتر از میزبان بود همگی از روی ضربات آزاد و دریبل*های شجاعی حاصل شد. آیا علی دایی می*خواهد چشمش را به این حقایق ببندد! آیا او ندید كه عربستان فوتبال بسیار بهتری از ایران به نمایش گذاشت، آیا متوجه ضعف مدافعان ایران شد و اینكه مهاجمان میزبان نزدیك به 10بار به راحتی قلب دفاع ایران را شكافتند و صاحب موقعیت گل شدند. درست است كه از نظر امتیازی ایران و عربستان با هم به تساوی رسیدند، اما اگر بخواهیم درباره نحوه بازی دو تیم قضاوتی عادلانه داشته باشیم سطح بازی عربستان آنقدر

    Leave a comment:


  • Hadi
    replied
    as ever, I completely agree with both of your points Haji joon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doctor DOOM
    replied
    I kind of agree.

    1- on the left:
    when we have two such players, I agree we better change things around.

    aside from the fact that , as usual zareh had a poor game ( I'm out of count ) and ought to be benched, but lets assume we have an OK LB there, Mr. X.
    and we have a RW who isnt exactly good in defending and doesnt track back.

    I reckon the best & ideal thing to do is put two new players.

    barring that ideal option, I'd say if the RW is great in offense and we cant discard him, then we might as well put a very strong and highly efficient DEFENDER behind him and not expect this LB to attack. let him stay put and do what he does best, which is defend. lets not ask him to join in attack, surge forward or expect crosses or ... . just plain defending and nothing more.
    we do have players of this caliber in Iran.
    not ideal. but we're talking about a compromise case.

    you may not stand to "gain" much from that side, but you at least make sure you dont "lose" anything on the left.

    ------------------------

    2- I actually see a lot of potential in gholamnejad and think he was the best defender among the 4 we had in the game.
    yes, as said before, he isnt kaabi. and he did have some mistakes here and there. but we could have done far worse than him. far worse!

    I think not having a proper right midfielder in front of the lad exposed him too much. while ando was there, our attacks down that side suffered. as ando was just horrible in passing and crossing and ... !
    and when shojaei was switched with ando, our defense suffered as shojaei didnt take part in defending !

    so I'd look more at the midfield on the right than poor gholamnejad.


    --------------

    I also agree with 2 of the 3 subs.
    anyone cares to explain about the whole khatibi for rezaei , as ur FIRST subbing?
    A) why rezaie , that early ?
    at that time ando was absolutely awful. anyone and everyone expected the first sub to be ando.
    B) why khatibi ? when we had madanchi, jabbari, ... on the bench.

    Leave a comment:


  • zzgloo
    replied
    Very correct assesments !!
    May be the midfield-forward transitions was another short comeings....
    As some one who does not have much beliefe in Daei, I must agree with your view of him as, being brave !

    Leave a comment:


  • Hajagha
    started a topic Two strategic mistakes by Daei in Saudi’s game

    Two strategic mistakes by Daei in Saudi’s game

    1, Having two unspecialized players, Zandi and Zare, in the left side cost us a goal and could have hurt us even more. Zandi is not disciplined defensive player. Also, none of them are aggressive defenders who do tackle in their regular basis.

    Solution: At least one of them should be benched for a more defensive players. My guess would be Zandi as we have more options for his replacement. I really wish Karimi could come back in competitive form as he will be the best option as the “left-inside midfielder” in the 4-4-2 diamond formation.

    2, Playing a young, inexperienced and overwhelmed defender like Gholamnejad in his first international game in your toughest away game while you have a better options like Kia is not risk, it’s mistake.

    Solution: There is no solution any more for that as Kaebi will be back and Gholamnejad has gained the experience needed.

    Saying that, Daei showed why he is worth trusting him by his wise and on-time sub’s. Plus, he showed that our kids are 90 minutes game fit.

    He is the only brave coach we have had after 10 years (Malyeli-kohan era with his own issues), who is willing to risk to get the job done. Weren’t we whining about the Team Melli coaches are too conservative? Well, here we go, we got the best coach money can buy.

    Cheers,

Users Viewing This Topic

Collapse

There are 0 users viewing this topic.

Working...
X