Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Karim Ansarifard, Ehsan Hajsafi, & Milad Mohammadi @ AEK Athens | 2021-2022

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ostad_Goosfand
    replied
    Amiri IMO is needed in midfield, so unless we play 3-5-2 we are stuck with one of the options at LB. if we play counter attacking we need his pressing ability.

    potential 3-5-2

    CBs: hosseini, kanaani, khalilzadeh
    RWB/LWB: Amiri and moharrrami wingbacks
    CM: ezatolahi, nourollahi, Ghoddos
    Forward: taremi, azmoun


    also possible to play ghoddos at RWB and maybe someone else (mehdipour, karimi) at CM

    Leave a comment:


  • Nokhodi
    replied
    Originally posted by Iranianarsenal11 View Post
    Hahaha.. With all due respect to Ehsan he's had a decent few matches now that he's replaced Milad

    I trust Hajsafi at LB over Milad and Noorafkan tbh... At least he has experience?
    What's remarkable is Hajisafi has experience with 2 World Cups (probably going to his 3rd), 3 Asian Cups, and I think even an ACL final, but he somehow doesn't learn from any of his mistakes.
    in 2008-09, we really thought we had found a gem, but he got worse and worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • Karimi 8
    replied
    Originally posted by Artaxerxes View Post
    I hear you, but tell me, who beside mimo do we have have that can keep up whit the pace of England and Usa?
    He has the speed, but he literally can't play football anymore. I don't get what happened to him, he looks so defeated when he is playing. He can't complete a simple pass or tackle anymore. He and Hajsafi are both huge liabilities

    Leave a comment:


  • Karimi 8
    replied
    Originally posted by Iranianarsenal11 View Post
    Hahaha.. With all due respect to Ehsan he's had a decent few matches now that he's replaced Milad

    I trust Hajsafi at LB over Milad and Noorafkan tbh... At least he has experience?
    His only experience in TM as LB is being bad at it. He literally cost us so many goals with his man-marking. I don't understand how after 14 years he never learned how to play the position.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nokhodi
    replied
    Everyone is making great points.

    With Hajisafi we have someone who is lacking speed and real defensive ability but can play the ball out.
    With Milad, every attack we start from his end will fail but he is an aggressive defense.
    It’s clear we need Vahid as LB. Someone like Ghodoos will then have to play Vahid’s usual DM role.

    Unless someone magical shows up in the next few months as Lb, it is now our 2nd weakest side (after RB).

    Leave a comment:


  • The
    replied
    Originally posted by Farzadfarhangni View Post
    The thing about Milad is his defense. His offensive qualities (ball control, crossing, breaking a press, vision, etc...) was never there. But players always have a hard time getting by him, his positioning defensively is perfect, he tackles at the right time and he has speed. And he has been doing this defensive bit the longest amongst the mentioned candidates for LB. Of course, this makes for half a player, but beggars can't be choosers. I can really only see him playing against England.


    AEK may need their LB to take the ball up and cross into the box... Hajsafi would be much better than Milad for that role. Maybe that is why they go back and forth with Milad and Hajsafi. If the opposition has a dangerous RW that needs to be contained, then Milad, otherwise, Hajsafi.
    That's where I'm too. Against England, I don't care if our Fullbacks don't attempt a single cross as long as they don't get blown by or miss their defensive assignments. Even against Korea, Milmo was solid defensively, happened to be out of sync with the team on the ball.

    Noorafkan can't even mark Asian opponents. Not even hyperbolic to say he was one of the worst Sepehan players in ACL.

    And Hajisafi is too slow to contain players who cutback.

    Give Milmo a couple of starts, if he doesn't work, the fuck it, play Amiri there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kian Persepolis
    replied
    Originally posted by ballhugger View Post
    For everyone who thinks Hajsafi is a good choice for LB, please go back and watch all his games at that position. In particular go back to the Portugal game and watch how Portugal scored.

    Hajsafi maybe an adequate LB for Asian standards (BIG maybe), but he should not be our LB at the world cup. Has anyone watched England's, or even USA's wingers? ....or Wales/Scotland?

    LB is going to be a problem for us at the WC, no matter what, but I prefer anyone but Hajsafi for that position.
    2 of Iraq's 3 goals in 2015 AC were also his fault.

    Leave a comment:


  • Farzadfarhangni
    replied
    Originally posted by Iranianarsenal11 View Post
    Have to agree completely.. Milad is no where near Team Melli level anymore, not even backup worthy to be honest. He can't even control a simple ball and send in normal passes anymore.. it's kind of sad to be honest.
    Noorafkan, while completely inept defensively, at least has some redeeming qualities offensively. He reminds me of a young Hajsafi almost... Ready to shoot a rocket into NASA like his predecessor. We're in all honesty screwed at left back...
    Our best options are to try out Jafar Salmani at LB, play Vahid Amiri there, or trust Hajsafi to at least let his experience at LB not completely shit on us...
    The thing about Milad is his defense. His offensive qualities (ball control, crossing, breaking a press, vision, etc...) was never there. But players always have a hard time getting by him, his positioning defensively is perfect, he tackles at the right time and he has speed. And he has been doing this defensive bit the longest amongst the mentioned candidates for LB. Of course, this makes for half a player, but beggars can't be choosers. I can really only see him playing against England.


    AEK may need their LB to take the ball up and cross into the box... Hajsafi would be much better than Milad for that role. Maybe that is why they go back and forth with Milad and Hajsafi. If the opposition has a dangerous RW that needs to be contained, then Milad, otherwise, Hajsafi.

    Leave a comment:


  • inarsenewetrust
    replied
    Originally posted by Artaxerxes View Post
    I hear you, but tell me, who beside mimo do we have have that can keep up whit the pace of England and Usa?
    the thing is milad WONT be able to + he is a walking turnover. None of the options can, for sure not 1v1. Thats why we may have to adopt 352 system where a lwb is provided additional cover by a nearby CM and wider CB. And if we do, stupidly, keep a flat back 4 vs england, then that player will need to be totally covered. The most defensively solid option is probably Khalilzadeh as a LB, if we play with wing backs then amiri at LWB would be a strong candidate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Artaxerxes
    replied
    I hear you, but tell me, who beside mimo do we have have that can keep up whit the pace of England and Usa?

    Leave a comment:


  • Keshwardoost
    replied
    Originally posted by Iranianarsenal11 View Post
    Have to agree completely.. Milad is no where near Team Melli level anymore, not even backup worthy to be honest. He can't even control a simple ball and send in normal passes anymore.. it's kind of sad to be honest.
    Noorafkan, while completely inept defensively, at least has some redeeming qualities offensively. He reminds me of a young Hajsafi almost... Ready to shoot a rocket into NASA like his predecessor. We're in all honesty screwed at left back...
    Our best options are to try out Jafar Salmani at LB, play Vahid Amiri there, or trust Hajsafi to at least let his experience at LB not completely shit on us...
    we can allwayz play ghoddos or arj there? eaven if they are needed up front they have played there for their clubs and did ok.

    not saying this is THE solution or that is a good solutin, just saying its an option that possibly can work. and open up some space infront for players like allahyar, mohebbi, moving down azmoun/taremi to ghoddos position and put zahedi on top etc..

    (or GHAEDI )

    Leave a comment:


  • Iranianarsenal11
    replied
    Originally posted by inarsenewetrust View Post
    How on earth can milad be a better alternative when he has been so shit for AEK and TM that he got replaced by the same Hajsafi and Norafkan respectively??

    Yes, on paper we all want him to be our left back, he has shown he can play at a solid level before. But that simply isnt the reality today, he is the worst of the lot. Think how bad you need to play to have Hajsafi displace you. The highlights are in this thread, the guy is useless.
    Have to agree completely.. Milad is no where near Team Melli level anymore, not even backup worthy to be honest. He can't even control a simple ball and send in normal passes anymore.. it's kind of sad to be honest.

    Noorafkan, while completely inept defensively, at least has some redeeming qualities offensively. He reminds me of a young Hajsafi almost... Ready to shoot a rocket into NASA like his predecessor. We're in all honesty screwed at left back...

    Our best options are to try out Jafar Salmani at LB, play Vahid Amiri there, or trust Hajsafi to at least let his experience at LB not completely shit on us...

    Leave a comment:


  • inarsenewetrust
    replied
    How on earth can milad be a better alternative when he has been so shit for AEK and TM that he got replaced by the same Hajsafi and Norafkan respectively??

    Yes, on paper we all want him to be our left back, he has shown he can play at a solid level before. But that simply isnt the reality today, he is the worst of the lot. Think how bad you need to play to have Hajsafi displace you. The highlights are in this thread, the guy is useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Artaxerxes
    replied
    Originally posted by ballhugger View Post
    For everyone who thinks Hajsafi is a good choice for LB, please go back and watch all his games at that position. In particular go back to the Portugal game and watch how Portugal scored.

    Hajsafi maybe an adequate LB for Asian standards (BIG maybe), but he should not be our LB at the world cup. Has anyone watched England's, or even USA's wingers? ....or Wales/Scotland?

    LB is going to be a problem for us at the WC, no matter what, but I prefer anyone but Hajsafi for that position.
    I sadly think our best alternative is Milad Mohammadi because of his speed, he is the only one that can keep up whit England and Usa wingers.

    Leave a comment:


  • ballhugger
    replied
    For everyone who thinks Hajsafi is a good choice for LB, please go back and watch all his games at that position. In particular go back to the Portugal game and watch how Portugal scored.

    Hajsafi maybe an adequate LB for Asian standards (BIG maybe), but he should not be our LB at the world cup. Has anyone watched England's, or even USA's wingers? ....or Wales/Scotland?

    LB is going to be a problem for us at the WC, no matter what, but I prefer anyone but Hajsafi for that position.

    Leave a comment:

Users Viewing This Topic

Collapse

There are 0 users viewing this topic.

Working...
X