First Goal:
[What people say] -
[The Incident] -
[What Actually Happened] -
The Iranian players didn't surround the ref to convince the ref of their innocence.
They weren't asking the ref to allow the game to be played on as if they caused the tackle, no.
They were trying to explain how Minamino dived and that the ref should be blowing the whistle to punish the player for unsportsmanlike behavior.
The ref acted as if Kanaani tackled Minamino, but allowed the game to be played on since Japan got hold of the ball and scored.
Also, Minamino looked back, noticed the Iranian team gathering around the ref, which motivated him to get up and take advantage of the free ball since the ref never blew the whistle.
Even the goalscorer, Osako, raised his arms to express his opinion that Japan should have a freekick which is another reason why the game should've stopped.
KEY INFORMATION FOR VAR!! -
Basically, yes,
Iran should've kept playing since the ref never blew the whistle, however, that's really irrelevant because even if Japan would score in that case, it would still be from the build up after the dive.
Here is where people say, "you don't stop playing when the ref hasn't blown the whistle", blaming Iranian players for conceding the goal.
FACTS:
JUDGEMENT:
Even players from the top leagues in the world rush to the ref when a player dives, and they even make the VAR sign with their hands.
The ref always blows the whistle. It is either a foul or a card for diving.
If the ref is unsure then VAR is used when available.
In this specific case, it's biased, cheating, and a corrupt judgement.
Another example of video editing decisions being biased against Iran is how the highlights shown on AFC's youtube channel edits the videos to make the opponents that got dominated by Iran look stronger than they were.
Even neutral fans commented about this actually happening on the youtube clip highlights.
One that hasn't been mentioned however, is when China almost scored in the beginning of the game, when it was an offside.
They didn't show the offside flag on the highlight.
I have never seen a highlight video cutting off the offside moment from an offside, or not showing the replay where the pass itself was offside.
[What people say] -
- "Iran was unprofessional and mentally weak for running towards the ref and constantly complaining".
- "They deserved to be scored on and it was a fair goal for Japan".
- "The ref didn't blow the whistle and yet Iranian players complained instead of playing".
- "You don't stop playing when the ref hasn't blown the whistle".
[The Incident] -
- Minamino runs towards the ball after his teammate Osako does a pass.
- The pass is never reaching Minamino first and Kanaani does a clean clearrance of the ball without touching or physically battling with Minamino.
- Minamino decides to bump into Kanaani and theatrically goes down with a diving figure, seeking for a freekick.
- This is punishable and in most cases a yellow and sometimes red. VAR was available but not used.
[What Actually Happened] -
The Iranian players didn't surround the ref to convince the ref of their innocence.
They weren't asking the ref to allow the game to be played on as if they caused the tackle, no.
They were trying to explain how Minamino dived and that the ref should be blowing the whistle to punish the player for unsportsmanlike behavior.
The ref acted as if Kanaani tackled Minamino, but allowed the game to be played on since Japan got hold of the ball and scored.
Also, Minamino looked back, noticed the Iranian team gathering around the ref, which motivated him to get up and take advantage of the free ball since the ref never blew the whistle.
Even the goalscorer, Osako, raised his arms to express his opinion that Japan should have a freekick which is another reason why the game should've stopped.
KEY INFORMATION FOR VAR!! -
- Everyone stopped playing besides the diver, including Japan.
- This is equivalent to when players grab the ball with their hands when they go down, which leaves the ref with no choice but to blow the whistle.
Basically, yes,
Iran should've kept playing since the ref never blew the whistle, however, that's really irrelevant because even if Japan would score in that case, it would still be from the build up after the dive.
Here is where people say, "you don't stop playing when the ref hasn't blown the whistle", blaming Iranian players for conceding the goal.
FACTS:
- The ref should've used VAR and realized that it was a dive which led to the goal, meaning that the goal should not stand.
- It basically didn't matter whether the Iranian players kept playing or not.
JUDGEMENT:
- The commentators explained how the ref had a good look and decided it wasn't a faul.
- If it was a faul then the ref should allow the advantage as he did, however he decided it wasn't a faul.
- The only options remaining are 1) dive or 2) advantage is allowed to be played.
- If it was an advantage, then he needed to use VAR to see if there was any contact which there wasn't, meaning there was no foul and the goal should be disallowed.
- If it was a dive (which it was), then he still needed to use VAR to see the incident, considering that many players notified him of this during the incident.
- Yet, it's punishable to make the VAR sign with your hands as a manager or player. In this case, the players behaved legally to communicate with the ref instead of bending the rules, even though they should've played.
Even players from the top leagues in the world rush to the ref when a player dives, and they even make the VAR sign with their hands.
The ref always blows the whistle. It is either a foul or a card for diving.
If the ref is unsure then VAR is used when available.
In this specific case, it's biased, cheating, and a corrupt judgement.
Another example of video editing decisions being biased against Iran is how the highlights shown on AFC's youtube channel edits the videos to make the opponents that got dominated by Iran look stronger than they were.
Even neutral fans commented about this actually happening on the youtube clip highlights.
One that hasn't been mentioned however, is when China almost scored in the beginning of the game, when it was an offside.
They didn't show the offside flag on the highlight.
I have never seen a highlight video cutting off the offside moment from an offside, or not showing the replay where the pass itself was offside.
- Iran got robbed by a team that is favorised for its sponsorship revenues.
- Iran got robbed by a team that is legally eligible to become South American Champions over money.
- This proves that money means more than the sport itself by those who make the rules.
- This proves that favorism is real, on paper.
- This goes against the laws of football.
Comment