Originally posted by Team Melli Fan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FIFA 17 Iranian players
Collapse
X
-
Who runs their data team. Its an embarrassment. Its like they have a complex against Iranian players.
-
Typical bullshit EA logic… Instead of increasing his potential to at least 79 (he deserves 80 potential IMO) after the killer season he had, they lower his potential just because he prefers Iran over Sweden...Originally posted by Team Melli Fan View PostGhoddos' potential went down after his Sweden rejection:
https://sofifa.com/player/231949
Leave a comment:
-
Ezzatollahi rocked the Uzbek midfield one of which ia akhmedov who is a 75 ovr in FIFA. He did the same against Korean midfielders in their low/mid 70s.
66 is fine. Lower doesnt make sense
Leave a comment:
-
66 is definitely NOT overrated. It's the perfect number for him at the moment. This is a player who helped his country qualify to the World Cup. Not to mention he was a part of a team from the 2016-17 UEFA Champions League. He didn't play much but 66 is definitely not an overrated rating for Ezatolahi.
Leave a comment:
-
66 is still good enough. Not higher or lower. That's just the perfect rating for him imoOriginally posted by Hoorad View PostI feel like he's not reaching his full potential, when was the last time he scored or had an assist?
Leave a comment:
-
I feel like he's not reaching his full potential, when was the last time he scored or had an assist?Originally posted by Kian B. View PostNah I'd actually say that's about right. You're saying 66 rated is too much for a starter on the 23rd ranked team in the world?
Leave a comment:
-
Nah I'd actually say that's about right. You're saying 66 rated is too much for a starter on the 23rd ranked team in the world?Originally posted by Hoorad View PostLol this is the first time we can say a player is overrated on FIFA. 66 rated Ezatolahi is kind of overrated imo.
Leave a comment:
-
Lol this is the first time we can say a player is overrated on FIFA. 66 rated Ezatolahi is kind of overrated imo.
Leave a comment:
-
If our players get ratings above 65+ I can play with them.Originally posted by AsOen5 View PostI still hope the criticism from the last WC Edition got to some EA guys who will change things this time around.
With FIFAs engine if someone wants to play defensive its easy to win 1-0.
Usually I prefer tiki taka or counters but with Iran if we get ok ratings in the 65-75 range its 4-5-1/5-4-1 time.
2010 was fun because while our ratings were not terrible Borhani/Rezaei were fast af and surprised guys who used teams with slower defenses. Nekounam/Ando combo was a wallLast edited by perspolis#1; 08-08-2017, 05:06 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Is there a link/source to this?Originally posted by RubinKazanUK View PostSaeid now has a photo and will be in FUT18, 66 rated currently.
Mohammadi also has a photo now.
Leave a comment:
-
Saeid now has a photo and will be in FUT18, 66 rated currently.
Mohammadi also has a photo now.
Leave a comment:
-
Whatever, Azmoun is our best player in the game. He has a black card and he's higher than all the Saudi players. Omar Al Soma is not a Saudi player. Although he likes to represent them instead of Syria.
Speaking of Syria, they are so toast in Azadi.
Leave a comment:
-
Hey guys, EA was right to rate our defense lower than the powerhouse Afghanistan in WC 2014! They have huge respect for Iranian players like CB Mohammad Hosseini who led our defense to the 2014 World Cup! Who could forget?Originally posted by Iranianarsenal11 View PostTrust me it wont
In before PAG and Montazari are both rated lower than 65
I think there is some Saudi at EA programming the game who goes out of their way to disrespect our team.
4 times or so this past season, there were predictions that Iranian players would get black cards, specifically Jahanbakhsh deserved at least one. They gave it to crappy players instead with less impressive performances. EA makes a crap game anyway. Wish there was a company who made a non-arcade football game that put its time into authenticity and accuracy instead of remaking the same game every year with new shiny cards.
Leave a comment:
-
Trust me it wontOriginally posted by AsOen5 View PostI still hope the criticism from the last WC Edition got to some EA guys who will change things this time around.
In before PAG and Montazari are both rated lower than 65
Leave a comment:
Users Viewing This Topic
Collapse
There are 0 users viewing this topic.
footer ad
Collapse
Leave a comment: