Azmoun had 69 during his very first season with Rubin KazanOriginally Posted by Sly
Didn't Jahanbakhsh have 69 when he was in NEC?
Lol where did you get those statistics from? "Taremi scores a goal out of 10 scoring chances per game" (no way he or any other striker is able to create that many scoring chances in a game unless the opponent is Maldives or Bangladesh) and no way was Hashemian this clinical. You just pulled those statistics out of your sleeve.Well, let's agree to disagree. A better finisher is not necessarily measured by only their average scoring stats. As said, you have to put their missed chances into the calculation. Taremi scores a goal out of 10 scoring chances per game. Hashemian at his prime, only needed 2 or 3 chances to score.
Taremi is a very good player but speed is not among his advantages. You're being delusional dude.
Ps. Hashemian played for TM mostly during Branko's time, at a time where old Daei was consistently played as the lone striker upfront and just like Taremi, Hashemian was used in the wing.
Fact is that Hashemian did play games during the world cup qualification for WC 2006 as the lone striker and during the world cup against Portugal, while Taremi has never played as the sole striker for TM, always on the wings. Also, Taremi is not a target man or a striker, he is best suited as second striker, but can also play on the wings and as a midfielder.
And another fact is that Taremi has a better scoring average per game than Hashemian for TM.
You do realize that there is a difference between running and sprinting with and without a ball (unless you're Messi)? Hashemian was never able to make a rush with a ball across the field like that, he lacked the pace and technique/dribbling skills. Show us a footage of Hashemian making rushes like that with the ball against strong opponents and i stand corrected. You talk as if you witnessed a sprinting duel between the two where you measures their times. Can you believe this guy?
Taremi is by far the better player of the two.
Hashemian wasnt special, he was in germany since he was 18, had 1-2 good seasons , very good seasons bit after that some low years ....... very low ...taremi is better
You're wrong! Hashemian played lone striker only when Daei wasn't playing for any reason. Just as he played lone striker against Portugal because Daei did not play. In all other games where Daei played, Hashemian was used as a winger. Also Taremi has played as lone striker as well. You need to start following TM dude. lol
when has taremi played striker for TM? I remember maybe 30 mins vs S.Korea away when we tied 0-0 and that was bc of the red card
there’s not one similarity between them except facial features
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hashemian played as the sole striker way more than Taremi. If indeed Taremi has played as the sole striker could you give some examples? Hashemian played as the sole striker against Japan and Portugal, but also in plenty of other games. And yes i've been following TM way more than you have obviously. With your silly made up statistics regarding Taremi and Hahemian's goal ratio lol
That being said, do you really believe Hashemian was a better footballer than Taremi? Like i said, anyone who follows and understands football even a little knows that Taremi is the more talented player of the two
This is a silly argument. Hashemian played in a top five league and was bought by one of the best teams in the world. They would not buy him if they did not believe he was one of the best strikers in Germany. Taremi has done literally jack shit in comparison. The day Taremi plays in a top five league, then one could mention the two in the same breath. Maybe Taremi is a wasted talent and will light up one top league but until that happens, Hashemian is leagues ahead of him...pun intended.
Members who have read this thread : 410You do not have permission to view the list of names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks