View Full Version : Team Melli - Syria game
Doctor DOOM
08-16-2006, 01:15 PM
Overall, a very poor game from TEAM MELLI, …. A DIRECT result of an extremely poor starting line up, and then, poor strategy after our goal.
1-
Allow me to start with the starting line up.
This was a line up based on NOT technical matters or the needs of this game.
No.
It was based on a lot of peripheral domestic matters, grudge and basically factors that had NO RIGHT to be considered when a national team is concerned.
Following Niki’s very poor game against UAE, many expected to see him on the bench, and to see a new face, like Mani’ee in the starters.
Not only Mani’ee did well during those minutes he played, Niki’s extremely poor performance should have been indicative of this much needed change.
Niki , except on a couple of occasions, was the ABSOLUTE poorest player we had.
Not that the player in front of him, Madanchi was any great shakes!
He also, apart from a couple of moves, was quite poor and inconsistent.
I believe inclusion of Niki was NOT a technically based decision.
It had more to do with GHALE NOEI trying to show a moderate and unbiased face ( considering his rows and problems with Niki, which led to Niki leaving Esteghlal ) and to show his personal problems with Niki do not interfere with his TEAM MELLI decision makings.
A very wrong thought process, as GHALE NOEI in the process, closed his eyes to Niki’s very poor present form, and deprived TEAM MELLI of a far better option .
I suspect keeping the poor performing Madanchi for 70 minutes had something to do with pleasing the red club’s supporters.
At least to some extent.
Again, the wrong process in selection of starters.
And I wonder if Kaabi's benching is not an indication of the said "grudge" against the former coach, and the present coach's desire to "show him right" !!
Because by all logic and sense, a home game, against a weaker team, would have been sufficient reason behind using an attacking and experienced right back like Kaabi, instead of Shakouri.
Such decisions and selection carves a negative notch against GHALE NOEI.
2-
I must vehemently question the coach and the team’s decision to pull back after Nekounam’s goal.
This is exactly how we suffered under branko; an overcautious approach to games that normally and by all laws of logic should be in the bag for our much stronger team.
TM’s retreat reminded of the nightmarish retreats under branko. And that cant be good.
We ( sort of ) had the Syrians pinned back, and were ( sort of ) in control of the game. Now, why a team of our stature, INSIDE AZADI, should take their foot off the pedal is a mystery to me.
At one point, we had 3 defensive midfielders on the pitch!
Teymoorian, Nekounam and Kazemi !!!
Against Syria?
Absurd !
Another notch against GHALE NOEI.
3-
Lack of a "playmaker" really plagued our team in almost 3/4th of the game, until Mobaali and Kazemian came in.
Granted, neither of these two are at the top of their form, and they certainly can do far better.
But our Goal should serve as enough reminder that no team can win a game with no playmaker.
4-
Now, onto some of the performers.
First of all, Mr. Khatibi.
Why such a speedy player should ever get caught in offside trap is beyond me.
I can imagine a slower forward who does not have the pace to outrun his mark, to stray in and out of the offside line and get caught repeatedly.
But a pacey forward like Khatibi?
Wasting chance after chance with wrong positioning?
The highlight was when he wrongly ( while in the offside ) intercepted a lovely forward pass by Mobaali intended for Kazemian, who made the correct run from inside right.
That denied the team of a very good opportunity.
And then, to argue with Mobaali on this?
Not a good game, Mr. Khatibi.
Not a good game at all.
Subbing him out was a good decision. But it should have been with another forward or at least an attacking midfielder. Not yet another defensive midfielder !
I wont discuss the defenders, as almost 90% of the game, they were not put under any kind of pressure, as Syria had adopted a very very compact defensive formation.
But that does not excuse them of laxity in Syria’s goal and another occasion where they allowed the Syrian forward to get one-on-one with Talebloo.
Another game like this, will mean a lot of neutral observers start to take position against the defensive strategies and even the line up.
A big surprise was how ineffective Shakouri was, especially after his bright game against UAE !
Kaabi, anyone?
==================================
On the positives, Nekounam seems to have gained in confidence and performance, compared to his world cup games.
His long balls and passing reminded me of the good old days of his stardom.
Hope this is for keeps and continues to progress in the future.
And another one is seeing the captain’s armband around Mahdavikia’s arm.
A great sight to see, of a very deserving captain for our dear TEAM MELLI.
Bottomline;
Mr. GHALE NOEI has to do something about his decisions, …. And fast.
Not only his opportunities to show how deserving he is of the job, are very limited, but also our game against one of asia’s best teams, Korea is no joke.
Especially for our overhauled TM, who are really taking their time to get into the required rhythm.
I’m afraid another poor showing by GHALE NOEI, and it is a rather quick hello and goodbye to him, at TEAM MELLI camp.
=======================================
on the side, allow me to express my utter disgust and repulsion for the fans at the stadium, who not only failed to support their team properly, and were very quiet during most periods of the game, but also , once again allowed their inane and pathetic "color orientations" to take precedence over the national team jersey !
a direct victim of this repulsive and deplorable behavior was Niki who got booed and jeered everytime he touched the ball !
No wonder he is not performing well !
The-Red
08-16-2006, 02:45 PM
i agre with most of your points...but you see dr. doom jan, this is a cycle in our football....we start out with a vatani coach,,,for a year, we get bad results or get eliminated from a major competition, then we bring in a second class foriegn coach and...again we get red of him and say nom kharejis are bad, without ever trying out a world class coach who can actually get the job done.
Ali Chicago
08-16-2006, 04:31 PM
I think our team suffered in the following areas:
1-Poor Team and play speed.
2-Lack of a play Maker
3- Lack of creativity to deal with a packed defense (which is kind of related to point 1 4poor team and play speed). In other words lack of tactical diversity.
4-Poor coaching job by Ghaleh Noei.
Poor Team and Play speed
====================
I think our team was very slow and that allowed the Syrian to pack the defense and almost play a 4-5-1 or even a 3-6-1 most of the time. I think twice in the second half with long passes I think from Javad Nekoonam when Mandanchi got some space he got to do his thing. This Madanchi reminds me of this old player Abbas Karegher. He was from Traktoor Sazi and then came to Persopolice. He didnt' have anything (in my opinion) execpt speed. Boy he was fast though (anyhow back to the topic).
The only way to beat this packed defense of Syrica was a fast transition which our team totally was void of.
Remember Angola in WC, they didnt' play much of soccer only packed the defense. Syria in a way used the same tactic.
Lack of Play maker
==============
I was pleased with both Ando and Nekoonam, they did a great job to pressure the ball carrier right in front of our defense (between the mid circle adn our 18 yard line). They seemed to be close to each other and supported each other very well. They won a lot of balls from Syrian ball carriers.
The down side with this was the fact that with these two guys in there won't be a stop for a playmaker. I think Nekonaam had this duty today (being the playmaker) and although he had a good day, this is not his area. Someone like Shojai or Mobali (despite the fact that he is in slump) was needed there.
Lack of creativity to deal with a packed defense
====================================
Iran basically was taking the ball to the corners and crossing it. They at times tried to mix that with some runs from the middle. But basically Iran team doesn't have the tactical depth and ability to adjust to different tactical situation during the game (most Asian teams don't, but Iran specifically is poor in this area).
Also lack of team speed and transition game allowed Syrian always have 6-7 players defending. By team speed I am not talking about player being fast and running 100 yards under 11 seconds. I am talking how fast a team can carry the ball from their own 18 yard box to the opponent's 18 yard box.
Transition game is the ability to change from offense to defense and Vice Versa.
I was really disappointed to not seeing any strategy by GN to give the direction to Mahdavi Kia to attack the Syrian goal from the the touch line (labe Khat) and streching the Syrian defender in the width and then pass back for the attacking midfielders (like Nekoonam). In a way our goal was scored in this manner with a pass back from Mobali to Nekoonam.
So a faster team I am sure can kill Syrica easily. Probably that is how South Korean did well against them in Syria (SK beat them 2-1 in Syria).
Poor coaching job by Ghaleh Noei
=========================
Many of the issues DD pointed about playing Nikki or Madanchi I agree with. I realize these issues exist in Iran but GN need to show courage and face them. He will be accused of being Blue and all, but If I were him, I would have done my thing without paying attention to these rumor.
I was totally puzzled by his subs, first Kazemian and Mobali (offensive subs) and then pulling Khatibi out and putting Kazemi a defensive midfielder. Probably he was trying to protect one gaol lead and win the game and we saw what happend. As the saying in Iran says; Tarsoo sad bar meemeerad va shoja yek bar. This backing off after a one goal lead (combined with poor defensive skills of Iranian players (not just defenders)) has become a major major cancer of Iranian soccer.
Anyhow really really confusing sub strategy by GN. I defended GN becoming the head coach of TM, and still am willing to give the guy couple chances (not many) to see his competency. But by no stretch of imagination his team's performance today was anything reassuring.
I also don't know why he didn't bring in Kaabi to pair him up with Mahdavi Kia, these two guys with Karimi killed South Korea in China 2 years ago. Shakoori wasn't brillinat today.
Gotta back to work, write more later.
Amirza
08-16-2006, 05:14 PM
We will never get anywhere beyond where we are unless we directly address what our football needs --------> Tactics and plays
Who amongst you guys realy thought someone like Ghalenoei can add anything to our football ? what we must do is to TOTALY FORGET ABOUT RESULTS for a couple of years - pick and develop a team from scratch and get them ready for the next WC qualifiers. This team should be given to a TOP INTERNATIONAL coach whom in his IFF interviews must prove his ability to develop game plans, teach football plays - and prepare teams with tactical purposes. This coach must emphesize on our football strenght which is ball skills - and must be offensive minded, certainly at the Asian level.
Doctor DOOM
08-16-2006, 06:14 PM
Ali jan, you are correct.
in terms of tactics, our coaches have shown to be more one-dimensional than anything else.
they either get the job done with their sole tacticand strategy, or when they face someone who applies the counter-measures, they succumb !!
-------------
as for transition and speed, I think players like khatibi are much to be blamed.
they held the ball too long and tried to dribble or do too much with it, which allowed the syrians ( what few of them that ventured outside their half ) to regroup.
------------------
another thing that I forgot to mention in my previous post is the quality and type of our "crosses'.
many of them were too close to the keeper, who collected almost all of the balls.
not once did the players thought ( and more importantly, the staff ) of addressing this issue.
our corners, most freekicks, and in-game crosses .... all landed INSIDE the 6 yard box, close to the keeper, which makes it very easy for him to collect.
if I'm not mistaken , I think in the whole game I saw only two or 3 crosses that landed outside the 6 yard box, which incidentally, looked dangerous.
this is something that the staff shd notice and tell the players during the game.
same thing can be said about "shooting" .
with players like nekounam, kia, mobaali, madanchi, niki, ... even fekri, who shoot well in long ranges, I was quite amazed how the orders to shoot never arrived !
especially whne the opposing team is so packed in front of their box, which makes pentration difficult, one useful strategy is to pull the ball to the sides, create gaps in between, then pass to the center for a shooter to do the job.
much like the goal we scored.
I am very much amazed how this didnt strike the staff !!!!
very poor tactical mistake.
--------------
I think GN is following a sort of grudge, which will eventually harm us.
his not playing kaabi, instead of shakouri
his insisting on more of the attack coming off the left side , than the right ( with kia and kaabi, a formidable combo ),...... which to me , it looks as if GN is trying to tell branko "oh, we DO have good left footers and left sided players. and I'm going to show and prove it to you" !!!
which , if true, is quite childish.
sacrificing the team for an inane show of force ( which backfired with the players chosen ) !!!
at least he could have put Mani'ee in there for either of the two bungling lefties.
I am almost sure he would have done a better job than either ( or both ) of them.
yashar_fasihnia
08-16-2006, 09:25 PM
no comments..bezar unayi ke bayad khejalat bekeshan tu khejalate khodeshun ab shan!
i dunno whether to laugh or cry...
i just wanna say one thing,
remember how everyone immediately started off with their "i knew it, branko sucked, etc" after the world cup campaign?
i wanna see wat those guys have to say now.. did they know this was coming as well?? I dont think so! yea, sure, the guys like fateh terim will be leading TM once branko leaves:rolleyes:
gerye konin mosalmuna, gerye konin!!!
186forever
08-17-2006, 12:04 AM
I m not concerned with today s game
what I m waiting for is to see if he changes anything against korea and fixes at least some of his problems which he actually admit in iran varzeshi....I just hope it doesn t cost us the AC
we really need this to get some confidence back
Paradigm
08-17-2006, 03:03 AM
Overall, a very poor game from TEAM MELLI, …. A DIRECT result of an extremely poor starting line up, and then, poor strategy after our goal.
1-
Allow me to start with the starting line up.
This was a line up based on NOT technical matters or the needs of this game.
No.
It was based on a lot of peripheral domestic matters, grudge and basically factors that had NO RIGHT to be considered when a national team is concerned.
Following Niki’s very poor game against UAE, many expected to see him on the bench, and to see a new face, like Mani’ee in the starters.
Not only Mani’ee did well during those minutes he played, Niki’s extremely poor performance should have been indicative of this much needed change.
Niki , except on a couple of occasions, was the ABSOLUTE poorest player we had.
Not that the player in front of him, Madanchi was any great shakes!
He also, apart from a couple of moves, was quite poor and inconsistent.
I believe inclusion of Niki was NOT a technically based decision.
It had more to do with GHALE NOEI trying to show a moderate and unbiased face ( considering his rows and problems with Niki, which led to Niki leaving Esteghlal ) and to show his personal problems with Niki do not interfere with his TEAM MELLI decision makings.
A very wrong thought process, as GHALE NOEI in the process, closed his eyes to Niki’s very poor present form, and deprived TEAM MELLI of a far better option .
I suspect keeping the poor performing Madanchi for 70 minutes had something to do with pleasing the red club’s supporters.
At least to some extent.
Again, the wrong process in selection of starters.
And I wonder if Kaabi's benching is not an indication of the said "grudge" against the former coach, and the present coach's desire to "show him right" !!
Because by all logic and sense, a home game, against a weaker team, would have been sufficient reason behind using an attacking and experienced right back like Kaabi, instead of Shakouri.
Such decisions and selection carves a negative notch against GHALE NOEI.
2-
I must vehemently question the coach and the team’s decision to pull back after Nekounam’s goal.
This is exactly how we suffered under branko; an overcautious approach to games that normally and by all laws of logic should be in the bag for our much stronger team.
TM’s retreat reminded of the nightmarish retreats under branko. And that cant be good.
We ( sort of ) had the Syrians pinned back, and were ( sort of ) in control of the game. Now, why a team of our stature, INSIDE AZADI, should take their foot off the pedal is a mystery to me.
At one point, we had 3 defensive midfielders on the pitch!
Teymoorian, Nekounam and Kazemi !!!
Against Syria?
Absurd !
Another notch against GHALE NOEI.
3-
Lack of a "playmaker" really plagued our team in almost 3/4th of the game, until Mobaali and Kazemian came in.
Granted, neither of these two are at the top of their form, and they certainly can do far better.
But our Goal should serve as enough reminder that no team can win a game with no playmaker.
4-
Now, onto some of the performers.
First of all, Mr. Khatibi.
Why such a speedy player should ever get caught in offside trap is beyond me.
I can imagine a slower forward who does not have the pace to outrun his mark, to stray in and out of the offside line and get caught repeatedly.
But a pacey forward like Khatibi?
Wasting chance after chance with wrong positioning?
The highlight was when he wrongly ( while in the offside ) intercepted a lovely forward pass by Mobaali intended for Kazemian, who made the correct run from inside right.
That denied the team of a very good opportunity.
And then, to argue with Mobaali on this?
Not a good game, Mr. Khatibi.
Not a good game at all.
Subbing him out was a good decision. But it should have been with another forward or at least an attacking midfielder. Not yet another defensive midfielder !
I wont discuss the defenders, as almost 90% of the game, they were not put under any kind of pressure, as Syria had adopted a very very compact defensive formation.
But that does not excuse them of laxity in Syria’s goal and another occasion where they allowed the Syrian forward to get one-on-one with Talebloo.
Another game like this, will mean a lot of neutral observers start to take position against the defensive strategies and even the line up.
A big surprise was how ineffective Shakouri was, especially after his bright game against UAE !
Kaabi, anyone?
==================================
On the positives, Nekounam seems to have gained in confidence and performance, compared to his world cup games.
His long balls and passing reminded me of the good old days of his stardom.
Hope this is for keeps and continues to progress in the future.
And another one is seeing the captain’s armband around Mahdavikia’s arm.
A great sight to see, of a very deserving captain for our dear TEAM MELLI.
Bottomline;
Mr. GHALE NOEI has to do something about his decisions, …. And fast.
Not only his opportunities to show how deserving he is of the job, are very limited, but also our game against one of asia’s best teams, Korea is no joke.
Especially for our overhauled TM, who are really taking their time to get into the required rhythm.
I’m afraid another poor showing by GHALE NOEI, and it is a rather quick hello and goodbye to him, at TEAM MELLI camp.
=======================================
on the side, allow me to express my utter disgust and repulsion for the fans at the stadium, who not only failed to support their team properly, and were very quiet during most periods of the game, but also , once again allowed their inane and pathetic "color orientations" to take precedence over the national team jersey !
a direct victim of this repulsive and deplorable behavior was Niki who got booed and jeered everytime he touched the ball !
No wonder he is not performing well !
Dr. Doom thanks for the many great points as usual. Just with regard to your last paragraph, I think TM will actually do better in its away games. You are right, currently the red supporters are unhappy with a (former) blue coach in charge and many blue players in the lineup. Last time we had these sorts of divisions we were eliminated from major competitions (AC 2000 & WCQ 2002).
Doctor DOOM
08-17-2006, 03:29 AM
yashar jan, I think we all can let go of branko.
irrespective of today's game , it is the truth that branko DID suck.
even if we bring a coach who loses 10-0 to guam, it wont change the FACT that branko sucked.
so give it a rest.
as for fateh terim or ..., I can see you are not capable of differentiating and distinguishing two very different & contrasting situations:
a team that has qualified for the WORLD CUP and a team ( with 4 years left to the WC ) and facing asian competition.
ponder on this a bit.
however, there IS a vast difference between GN & branko ( since you forced branko's irrelevent name into this topic ):
GN has enough spine to accept the responsibility of TM's bad performance.
he actually accepts he is to be blamed.
which goes to say a lot about him, when we contrast it with the weasle and wimpy attitude of branko who was in DENIAL till the last day.
who never owned upto any of his countless failures ( remember he was here for almost 5 years ), and lied, cheated and belittled all Iranian fans ( to which me and YOU also belong ) and our football and ... .
======================
paradigm jan, you may be right.
I think our fans are quite idiotic and foolish to bring "color" into TM games.
this, added to their utter uselessness and impotency in cheering and maintaining their support for their team, even for 90 minutes !
God, we must be having the absolute WORST fans in the world !!!!
:(
faraz
08-17-2006, 04:33 AM
I have yet to see the game, and once I do, i will for sure have some comments...
on ghalenoie,
i think he made a HUGE mistake when he decided to integrate a brand new system (a system completely different than what we've been doing in the past 4 years) at such a critical time. judging from comments (i haven't seen the past 2 TM games), it seems we are stuck in a 3 back defense - ghalenoie's favorite or w/e.
if he had been given 4 friendly matches (against local club teams even) to try and give the players a chance to mesh together in this system, then i wouldn't have a problem.
however, he chose NOT to stick to what had WORKED against ASIAN sides time and time again - a 4 back, with 2 wing backs constantly pressuring their respective sides.
taking away the wingback leaves Kia to do a lot of work by himself on the right, both defensively and offensively. if the wingback shares these responsibilites, both breathe a lil easier and both are can contribute almost equally to defense and attack.
this idea especially makes a lot of sense considering we have a GREAT right back in Kaebi and an even better winger in Kia.
without kaebi and kia working together, our right side becomes just as our left, and our football is left with nothing to give on the flanks, leaving a high level of importance in the middle of the park. without the creativity of a raw playmaker (using teymourian and nekounam in the middle), our game turns into something of a kick and run mentality worthy of toronto house league teams.
yashar_fasihnia
08-17-2006, 06:36 AM
yashar jan, I think we all can let go of branko.
irrespective of today's game , it is the truth that branko DID suck.
even if we bring a coach who loses 10-0 to guam, it wont change the FACT that branko sucked.
so give it a rest.
as for fateh terim or ..., I can see you are not capable of differentiating and distinguishing two very different & contrasting situations:
a team that has qualified for the WORLD CUP and a team ( with 4 years left to the WC ) and facing asian competition.
ponder on this a bit.
however, there IS a vast difference between GN & branko ( since you forced branko's irrelevent name into this topic ):
GN has enough spine to accept the responsibility of TM's bad performance.
he actually accepts he is to be blamed.
which goes to say a lot about him, when we contrast it with the weasle and wimpy attitude of branko who was in DENIAL till the last day.
who never owned upto any of his countless failures ( remember he was here for almost 5 years ), and lied, cheated and belittled all Iranian fans ( to which me and YOU also belong ) and our football and ... .
God, we must be having the absolute WORST fans in the world !!!!
:(
doctor jan, yes, we can let branko go, but at the same time, its from our previous mistakes that we learn. so we should always look back at history.
its only by comparing and contrasting our past with our presence that we learn wat were our mistakes that time and wat our current mistakes are.
So whether branko's name is mentioned by me or not, an educated man like urself will for sure at some point of time do this comparison. u know it, i know it, everybody knows it.
So why not discuss it rather than thinking about it alone??
Whether branko sucked or not, it depends how u define "suck"
he was no worldclass coach, nobody claimed it, but iran is no worldclass team either and yes, we have to take into consideration the political, economic and social atmosphere ruling over iran because this is wat the worldclass coaches will be looking for if they want to come to iran.
Thats why, a coach like branko, howmuch ever he sucked was one of the best coaches WE COULD have.
u look at ghalenoi's game against syria and branko's and u decide for urself who played better. Wasnt it people like u who accused us branko supporters of being result oriented?? Werent u the guys who demanded an attractive football?
So wat happened now? did u compare branko's game with ghalenoi's against this "piss poor teams" as u would call them???
Branko lost to jordan in azadi (btw jordan is much stronger than syria but that doesnt matter) but the difference with ghalenoi yesterday was iran clearly dominated the jordan game and had wat around 20 chances in that game?? we were unlucky not 1 ball went in that game.
but yesterdays game, although we dominated the game, how many real chances did we create???
Wasnt it people like u who said "dont get fooled by statistics and numbers, u should look at the game and judge the team and the coach??"
So wat happened?
About fateh terim, yes i understand ur point that it was before the worldcup and coaches were desperate to coach any team, even togo!
but wasnt it a bit late for a totally new coach to come adapt himself to the footballing and non-footballing issues of iran just before the worldcup??
unfortuantely, there was and is a very small gap between the worldcup and the asian qualifiers and the asian cup but not many people realized that.
The smartest thing was to keep branko for 1 more year and once the asian cup was over, we start with a new coach. however incompetent he was, he atleast knew how to make his team beat this "piss poor" asian teams.
With this campaign of ours, i think u and me agree we will 99.999% lose to korea in seoul, i think we will even lose in azadi to korea if we continue this way. we can try very hard for a win, and we can win, but we would need a lot of luck, teerak and exceptional performance by our players specially the defenders and the GK. If u think about it, syria will also lose to korea in the second game as well and iran and syria will be tied in points, maybe iran leading with 1 point assuming iran ties with korea in iran (god knows how but somehow!)
taiwan both iran and syria can beat, that too, HOPEFULLY!
then comes the deciding game between iran and syria, IN SYRIA!!!
if we are leading by a point, we can go for a draw, and i hope we get it cos its possible, but not easy! if we are equal on points as well, we have a good chance of even getting eliminated IN THE QUALIFICATION ROUND!!
u do understand this dont u??
So, maybe keeping branko for 1 more year was a wise option, but in our country, when was the last time a wise decision was made?? :rolleyes:
ghalenoi accepting responsiblity huh?
u talking about the guy who always blames "dasthaye poshte parde" after every game he loses but starts with "besmellah rahmane rahim" every time his team used to get a result!!:rolleyes:
i really dont care wat branko ever said, because branko was smart enough to know wat his mistakes were, the media and the fans in general were not. they would get emotionally upset and frustrated and unable to think logically and because branko was always being criticized and waitied by hungry wolves like maelli kohan and this ghalenoi himself, dadkhan being pressurized from all angles, as if it was in some kinda WARR!!
and which army in the war comes and says, it was my fault when clearly he is superior to a guy like maelli kohan or ghalenoi!
If branko never considered himself and his decisions wrong, he wouldnt substitute his favortie player navidkia after just 40 minutes of substituting him in. he wouldnt start playing more conservatively after we lost to jordan in the dying minutes from a stupid counter attack.
There are just 2 examples. If u actually bother to reconsider these stuff with a positive "niyat", u will see that branko realzied his mistakes, he just didnt say it to the media because thats all the media was waiting for.
its like the media is the FBI and branko is someone they arrested. now the media is beating the crap outta branko, tortuting him, just waiting for branko to admit it was his fault, and then finish, branko taken to court and punished somehow!! this was the exact situation our media and some "experts" had with him.
i will just make a small comparison with our real life. firing branko was like iran having a revolution today. branko wasnt a worldclass coach, islamic republic is not a worldclass government. branko had flaws, so does the isalmic republic. BUT, removing branko when there is no better candidate is STUPID!
just like removing the Islamic republic when we dont have a better candidate at hand! if we kick out islamic republic, mojaheddin and their fire sacrifices will take over, just like ghalenoi will take over!
ghalenoi will so easily (with that "spine" or guts of his which u admire) say, "aghaye fereydoune zandi jayi tu barnamehaye ma nadare" but the likes of majidi do!
and dont even think of saying, atleast ghalenoi didnt invite daei, because look at our forwards today and temme if daei is/was better than them or not!
P.S. its a pity how once, around a decade ago, iran had the best fans in the world. the TV still shows it when some program like varzesh mardom or navad wants to start, 100,000 fans waving the small paper iran flag.
look at them now, they come to jeer the players rather than cheer for them. i wont be surprised if our players start feeling easier and playing better away than at home!
Doctor DOOM
08-17-2006, 07:19 AM
I will compare and contrast the two coaches when GN has had 5 years at his disposal ( btw, I doubt he'd have another 5 WEEKS at his disposal ... barring some extraordinary events ), and sh*tload of money in his pocket, with numerous euro trips in his passport and all the support and .... that branko enjoyed.
agha jan, ... the guy hadnt even had his first game and most of you ppl drew your daggers and swords , cutting him on whatever issue you could mention !!!!
just as I have criticised his decisions in this game, I still have to stay fair.
what some of you dont count or omit or forget , is that TM has had a MAJOR overhaul in its roster, its staff and ... .
bring in Lippi and he'd have had immense trouble getting things going in his first game.
yes, some of GN's mistakes could have been easily avoided.
but it is quite ridiculous to compare a coach with ONE game under his belt, with a guy ( poseur ) who had 5 years and still his team played crap !
-----------
if you read khabars or iranvarzeshi or ... you'd see GN has taken sole responsibility of the poor performance.
you going back to his club tenure has absolutely NO relevence to what we're talking about.
he has shown he is fair and has a spine to own upto his mistakes.
whereas a certain gutless wimp never ... not once , did so.
his denial and dellusions ran so deep that till the end he stuck by his lopsided attitude and never changed.
it has nothing to do with who was subbed in one game or ... !
"OBSERVE" his attitude and approach during the last 2 years and you'll have ur answer.
this matter is over for me.
--------------
yashar_fasihnia
08-17-2006, 08:26 AM
ok, so supposing ghalenoi doesnt get 5 years, doesnt get the salary branko got and is not a passport holder, but he performs worse than branko, even after a year or so, still we shouldnt compare him with branko???
if thats the case, most coaches shouldnt be comapred, because most coaches dont have the same criteria!
how are we gonna know wats best for us if we dont compare and contrast? no matter he is european, asian or african, at the end of the day, he was the national coach, with the same facilities and same players. lets compare the results because thats ultimately wat counts and takes us to tournaments and rankings, not anything else!
and yes, ghalenoi is new, and i have stated it in the support the ghalenoi thread, and i will support him no matter wat, but that doesnt mean im satisfied with him. the same was with branko. but atleast with branko, i was more satisfied than this guy. ghalenoi just like branko or any other coach deserved his time and chances, and he is getting them and should get them, but criticizing is something which is done throughout, for which ever coach it is and u know it.
and u know wat, good coaches usually show some positive signs in the beginning games, just like potential players who are not developed, need time but they do show some positive signs at an early stage and thats wat earns them the title of "future prospects"
in my opinion, ghalenoi yet has to earn that title AT A NATIONAL LEVEL!
and frankly speaking, i think ghalenoi is just trying to avoid the mistakes/criticisms branko faced.
like u said about, ghalenoi is trying to prove branko wrong by being different like not using kaabi or watever.
In my opinion, this act of accepting the blame is also just one of them.
A grown up persons character wont go through such an immense change if he moves from a famous club coach like ESTEGHLAL's (on who the media is equally rough) to a national coach. he was a whiner in esteghlal, suddenly he will start accepting responsiblity and blame huh??
why cos he is professional?? cos he is ethical?? or he just wants to prove branko wrong like u said, to the critics, media, fans and branko himself.
However, such "fake" changes never last long or even if they do, somewhere, the truth finally comes out. this is only ghalenoi's second game as u said and we all know it. naturally noone expects much from him, so this guy can take responsiblity now because he knows people should not have much expectations from him.
i wanna see him continue this for another 1 year or even more and see if he is still ready to accept his mistakes! when the media becomes more rough on him, when he has had enough time with the team yet the results are not that great, i wanna still see him owning up for his mistakes!
and its interesting yet ironic how u were once opting for a coach change with a few months before the worldcup, but now ur saying "dont u see, there is a new coaching staff, players, roster, etc. they need time!!" :rolleyes:
besides, i dont see much of a revolution in the team.
more or less, its the same starting 11, the same bench, except for the injured players, and max 4 or 5 players here and there.
oh yes, and the amazing REVERTING BACK from a modern 4 back system to an ancient 3 back system, wat a revolution!! gud luck to our legionnaires specially who have to adapt back to a formation they havent played for years!
its like going back from democracy to dictatorship! simply amazing! Other nations move forward in life, we move backward!
Overall, a very poor game from TEAM MELLI, …. A DIRECT result of an extremely poor starting line up, and then, poor strategy after our goal.
1-
Allow me to start with the starting line up.
This was a line up based on NOT technical matters or the needs of this game.
No.
It was based on a lot of peripheral domestic matters, grudge and basically factors that had NO RIGHT to be considered when a national team is concerned.
!
Oh God...I couldn't wait to read the rest ..I just got all excited becuase someone other than me ...reads the line-up as "Very-little-to-do-with-football" team.
Thanks Doc , I will go ahead and read the rest now....
YEAH....I pretty much agree with your take , although I am a bit surprised that you are surprised by the fan's attitude in Azadi.
In case yo missed it , the last two matches so a huge number of Blue fans and singnificant reduction in Red fans.....I guess we all know why ...
In fact ...IRAN ...IRAN was mentioned one or more times but AMIR GHALENOEI chants was heard several times...and more.
Ali Chicago
08-17-2006, 11:14 AM
To be honest I am very disappointed with your posting. I guess I expected more from you. It sounds like you were just kind of itching for TM to not do well and you come here and claim " I told you so".
Let's don't forget Branko lost two games to Jordan and Maccedonia in Tehran (Azadi). No one made a big deal out of that at that time (not that they should have anyways).
First of all, as DD said, GN at least has the guts to take the blame. Read Iranian papere, he said, he is to blame. His players did what he wanted from them. This is someone who at least has integrity. Compare that with Branko, that blamed everything and everyone but himself. To him even the world cup fiasco wasnt' anythign to worry about and Iran did ok in WC.
Let's don't forget Branko's team lost in Azadi to Jordan and Maccedonia. No one made a huge deal out of that in that time which they shouldn't have anyways.
Secondly, Branko had 5 years, let's give GN 5 months. Iran didnt' play well yesterday, but this was against a team that played exactly like Angola in WC, packed defense. No team can play a beautiful game against a team that defends with like 9 players in their half. Iran scored two goals that were offside but very close. So game could have been easily 3-1 or even 5 -1 if you consider Kia's shot that the goalie barely saved and the shot that Nekoonam missed in 93-94th minutes in 6 yards. So if it comes to result only, this team isn't very different from the so called Branko's team.
Thrid, Branko wouldn't have dared to play without Rezai, Karimi, Dai, Zandi, Hashemian. These guys are doing Naaz for Iran and I respect GN for telling them to go to hell. If it was Branko he would have bent backward for them to play. GN has so much prinicipals to not doing it. Here I would like to thank Mahdavi Kia that seems to put the national interest above everythign else and probably despite not liking some issues with TM still like a soilder in war front reporting for each national duty.
And finally, one more time, assume GN sucks as you claim. Ok, at least after this experience he learn at least a few things. And that stays with an Iranian coach. It becomes part of the Iranian coaching experience and GN one day will use it during his coaching in Iran. Can we say the samething about Branko?
You see people like you have a not realistic view about foriegn coaches. Didn't Arie Haan experience teach us anything? Read what his assistant say now in Iranian papers. Young said that Arie haan told him, we are going to Iran to take over Iranian national team. When supposedly he came to coach Perspolice. Do you remember when Denizli left Tehran very close to important games for Paas. If it was an Iranian most probably he wouldnt' have done that. Lot of our players havent' been paid for months and still show up and play and all. That is the difference between an Iranian Vs. Non Iranian. Again, if we could bring lieks of Scolari to Iran it would have been a different story (and in this climiate of political and financial situation in Iran, we never can or will). If it is between a second class wanna be like Haan or Denizlie and GN, I rather loose with an Iranian, that way at least the guy learns something in the process.
Again, If " I told you so" was coming from a 18 year old in the general forum, I would not have been surprised. But I expected much more from you.
Doctor DOOM
08-17-2006, 03:17 PM
Yashar jan,
I didn’t say I need 5 years for GN to show his efficiency for me to formulate my opinion on his efficiency as TM coach.
Neither do I need a whole year to do so.
ordinarily, under normal circumstances, I would say 4-5 months is a fair deal for an Iranian, who has played in Iran, knows our football and players , and has led a club at our league. ( such circumstances do NOT apply for foreign coaches who come to Iran, of course. So plz don’t misread the above ).
I said “ordinarily” , coz I know these are NOT ordinary circumstances.
He just got the appointment, and he faces 3 crucial games.
I guess life’s not fair, and GN just cant get a break!
Unfortunately he is in this situation, and I totally understand why for example Jalali didn’t accept the position ( or even the candidacy for the post ), as I’m sure he was aware of the difficult situation he’d be put in.
Anyway, GN has to get it right , and extraordinarily quick.
If he fails, does it mean he’s no good?
Never.
I don’t think had he ample time to work with the team, he’d have done so badly.
So do I accuse him of being incompetent?
I will not.
2- you keep comparing the two and I just, for the life of me, dont see even a miniscule of sense in comparing these two.
so I wont even address such comaprisons.
3- plz dont play with words.
democracy under branko?
heh !
that ought to be entered in the joke books.
I dont think you'd like my answer on this issue.
------------------
majid jan, I wasn’t “surprised”.
I was extremely disgusted, though.
No matter how many times I see such behavior. It just never ceases to amaze me and remind me of how low our fan culture is in Iran !
--------------------
ali jan, I doubt anyone would want to come up with a "i told you so" argument, as nothing here backs such an argument.
like I said, if TM was in a normal situation and GN was given at least 5 months , and enough preparatory games & support ... THEN we could come up with such arguments, if he failed.
right now?
it's absurd to bring up "i told you so"s .
faraz
08-17-2006, 04:07 PM
just finished watching the game...
i pretty much agree with all of your points dd...
a couple of extra things:
1 - the constant arguing and bickering from our 2 forwards is disgusting. every ball is expected to be played to them and one occasion (as dd has pointed out), khatibi does not notice he is in an offside position, intercepts a pass to the wing ,and then yells at Mobali!!! this is just ridiculous. i thought enayati had a pretty good game actually, but he didn't have any real chances to score...again, lack of a true playmaker or a number 10 really hurt us, especially before mobali came in, who i thought did well actually, and not as bad as some make it seem
2 - to sit kaebi on the bench is ludicrous. i couldn't believe he was on the sideline, and probably thinking to himself...WTF am i doing here...
3 - if anyone thought branko had no game plan, then i wonder what people say of this game. i have never seen such horrid co-ordination and touches ont he ball than this game. Mr. Shakouri doesn't even deserve to be on the reserve list and doesn't seem to realize that sometimes, controlling a football is like catching an egg - he is not tender and not completely reliable at the back. actually, the whole of our back line seemed out of synch sometimes. i don't know if we're an attacking side or a defending side. i don't exactly see if we play on the ground, or if we attack with long balls...i don't know whether we cross or try a through ball...it is as if we do everything at once and we do everything poorly
personally, i'd say another 3 games for Ghalenoie to instill his true philosophy (or w/e it is) and let the team settle down. it is still early to judge, but i really don't think he'll be the man controlling the team for much longer.
many of the "stubborn" attitudes that many of you said branko possessed, he possesses as well, not to mention his reliance on a bunch of esteghlal players who frankly shouldn't be on the team as well as the use of his 3-5-2 which does not suit modern football any longer.
i wish tm all the best in the future - it ain't gonna be pretty from the looks of it
Doctor DOOM
08-17-2006, 04:17 PM
faraz jan, expecting coordination from this group is a bit too much and too early.
I agree, another 3 games, we shd be able to see ( or at least get strong enough indications ) the true potential of his leadership.
------------------
shakouri did quite well against UAE, and was totally opposite of syria.
so I'll wait .
but I'd rather have kaabi
--------------
actually most of the ss players did well in the game.
whom do you have in mind for ur criticism?
fekri was ok.
talebloo, acceptable
enayati, good
sadeghi pretty good
( kazemi came in too late. so no judgment on him )
so I dont see whom ur targetting as low performing.
====================
one major issue of the formation.
all those who go on talking about 3-5-2 or 4-4-2 , shd bear in mind a major, crucial factor.
we dont have time.
I repeat it, since I know many either dont acknowledge this very important fact, or just try not to accept it.
WE. DONT . HAVE. TIME.
which means we shd not behave as if we ought to "modernize" the team and instill this formation and that modern tactic in it ... when we have absolutely no time for these qualifiers.
( same thing applies to those who question the use of ss players , btw)
in such circumstances ( that many friends either omit or deny or forget ) a coach has to do what is more accepted among the players and general football of his region, and not try to devaite from what the players are used to and comfortable with.
this is not the time to "teach" or "revolutionize" or "inject modern thinking" or ... .
branko tried and tried , for 5 years and we still didnt have a reliable 4 back system.
I dont see any of you talk about that.
GN has had mere weeks, and I totally support his decision to go ahead with what the players are more comfortable with, rather than trying something new which throws everything into chaos.
come on ppl.
think a bit more before coming up with a series of numbers for this and that.
having said all that, I must say in many periods of the game, it did look like a 4-4-2 formation to me than 3-5-2.
shakouri and niki and right and left backs, with sadeghi and fekri in between.
so I dont see why ppl talk so much about 3-5-2 anyway.
yes, shakouri didnt have the offensive duties of kaabi, so we lacked in our attack on that side.
niki was also held back and kept as a defender more than anything else.
so this also reduced our peft side's capabilities.
( and niki and madanchi being out of form was "ghooz-e bala ghooz" !! )
Ali Chicago
08-17-2006, 04:23 PM
Everyone is critical of fans these days. As they dont' support the team and all.
Before I go any further I say it is wrong to jeer Nikki by the Blue fans cause he went to PP. But this is part of the football in everywhere in the world. It aint' logical, but football fans in most countries arent' among the most educated and intellectuals. They are amongst the poor and less fortunates and hence i am not surprised by some stuff I see.
So there are two issues. One is zelous short sighted fans (which btw is like 90% of fans in general in soccer). I attribute the Nikki's incident during the natioal game to this crowd.
Another issue is the progression of the fans due to internet and communication reveloution in 90s. As a result they want better product (soccer). I think it was Sharafi who supposedly said Iranian fans are way ahead of our football. People in this forum are a great example of this second phonomenon I am talking about.
I think our fans are seeign tons of games from the Channel 3 in Iran or abroad on tv. They see Bundesliga and La Liga and all and they have a baseline to compare, so when they see a sub par soccer (our Iranian Version) Vs. European soccer of course they don't get as enthusiastic.
Yashar mentioned early 90s 100k people waving Iranian flags and all. Our fans still fill the stadium for special occasion, Germany's national team game, BMunich game Vs. Perspolice or Iran Japan, and even Esteghlal final game that determined the championship, but not for every bloody game. Why? Because now there are so many venus for entertainment in Iran. At one time, there was soccer and nothing else. Now there is TV, internet, tons of other healthy and unhealthy entertainment, party thanks to Internet and Telecommunication reveloution.
I give you one example from USA. Los Angeles doesnt' have a NFL team. The team left LA and went to Saint Louis I think. It was LA RAMS and now it is Saint Louis Rams. Whereas GreenBay which is a little dinky town north of Wisconsin with like probably 300k people has a team in NFL (GreenBay Packers). Why? Cause people in LA never filled the stadium in LA. Whereas in Green Bay Wisconsion Green Bay Packers are the only game in town. Whereas in LA there are so many things to do, it is harder to get people to fill in all the stadium.
Now if you say this shouldnt' be that way that is a different story. I am merely tryign to see the reality and do something about the situation "the way it is" not the way "it is should/suppoed to be".
In a way, situation in Iran is the same, when I was a kid going to Amjadeieh was the biggest thing that could happen to me and I was stuck to watch Iranpock, Kalani, Mojdehi and Nayeb Agha, Like it or not.
Today my nephew in Iran who is only 10 (when I called him) was asking me "Uncle did you see B. Munich, ...... " game? "How Hargraves did such and such". Of course he is not satisfied with the Ali Asghari football and demands more. I think actually this is a very positive thing. Iranian soccer either has to improve to keep its fan base or it will eventually loose it.
faraz
08-17-2006, 04:38 PM
dd jan,
as a central defender, i'd rather have nosrati to be honest, more so than sadeghi. also, i would have liked to see bakhtiarizadeh instead of fekri, who didn't perform BADLY, but what did they really have to do against Syria? not to mention, they weren't so good on the offside trap (letting the syrian forward in 1 on 1 with taleblou!)
taleblou did NOT perform well. if people were openly critical of mirza, then taleblou should face the same criticism for his display against syria. he really faced 3 shots, 1 he bundled but saved, the free kick he saved, and the corner (one of the few syrian corners) he was in NO MAN'S land...what makes this keeper different from Mirza?...on the contrary, he is young in the international stage and i hope he develops into a more calm and collected keeper...as for what i saw against syria, i'd probably rather have mirza in net against korea.
as far as the time issue goes, you are correct...we dont' have time.
but just b/c we dont' have time doesn't mean the core of the team should be esteghlal and we should play with esteghlal's formation! plus, if time is an issue, then we'll never go back to modern football...b/c we can keep saying there is no time right until the 2007 qualifiers...
what ghalenoie has done is COMPLETELY change TM before a crucial period of our football, rather than tweak certain areas that could have used tweaking...
now you tell me, which one would be a better choice (from the above) if we are SHORT on TIME?
and Ali jan,
nice points there about fans...
in the end though, it is our duty to put colours aside and focus on iran, and only iran when it comes to the national team. if our colours come first, what sort of iranians are we? i am a true blue, but i when it comes to TM, i love seeing a player like kazemian on the wing, lively and energetic..
yashar_fasihnia
08-18-2006, 11:20 AM
To be honest I am very disappointed with your posting. I guess I expected more from you. It sounds like you were just kind of itching for TM to not do well and you come here and claim " I told you so".
Let's don't forget Branko lost two games to Jordan and Maccedonia in Tehran (Azadi). No one made a big deal out of that at that time (not that they should have anyways).
First of all, as DD said, GN at least has the guts to take the blame. Read Iranian papere, he said, he is to blame. His players did what he wanted from them. This is someone who at least has integrity. Compare that with Branko, that blamed everything and everyone but himself. To him even the world cup fiasco wasnt' anythign to worry about and Iran did ok in WC.
Let's don't forget Branko's team lost in Azadi to Jordan and Maccedonia. No one made a huge deal out of that in that time which they shouldn't have anyways.
Secondly, Branko had 5 years, let's give GN 5 months. Iran didnt' play well yesterday, but this was against a team that played exactly like Angola in WC, packed defense. No team can play a beautiful game against a team that defends with like 9 players in their half. Iran scored two goals that were offside but very close. So game could have been easily 3-1 or even 5 -1 if you consider Kia's shot that the goalie barely saved and the shot that Nekoonam missed in 93-94th minutes in 6 yards. So if it comes to result only, this team isn't very different from the so called Branko's team.
Thrid, Branko wouldn't have dared to play without Rezai, Karimi, Dai, Zandi, Hashemian. These guys are doing Naaz for Iran and I respect GN for telling them to go to hell. If it was Branko he would have bent backward for them to play. GN has so much prinicipals to not doing it. Here I would like to thank Mahdavi Kia that seems to put the national interest above everythign else and probably despite not liking some issues with TM still like a soilder in war front reporting for each national duty.
And finally, one more time, assume GN sucks as you claim. Ok, at least after this experience he learn at least a few things. And that stays with an Iranian coach. It becomes part of the Iranian coaching experience and GN one day will use it during his coaching in Iran. Can we say the samething about Branko?
You see people like you have a not realistic view about foriegn coaches. Didn't Arie Haan experience teach us anything? Read what his assistant say now in Iranian papers. Young said that Arie haan told him, we are going to Iran to take over Iranian national team. When supposedly he came to coach Perspolice. Do you remember when Denizli left Tehran very close to important games for Paas. If it was an Iranian most probably he wouldnt' have done that. Lot of our players havent' been paid for months and still show up and play and all. That is the difference between an Iranian Vs. Non Iranian. Again, if we could bring lieks of Scolari to Iran it would have been a different story (and in this climiate of political and financial situation in Iran, we never can or will). If it is between a second class wanna be like Haan or Denizlie and GN, I rather loose with an Iranian, that way at least the guy learns something in the process.
Again, If " I told you so" was coming from a 18 year old in the general forum, I would not have been surprised. But I expected much more from you.
ok, ali jan, first of all,sorry to disappoint u.
secondly, like i said myself, yes, with branko we lost to borh jordan and macedonia (both of whom can beat this syrian team) but people here said, dont just look at statistics and let the numbers fool and stuff. look at the game and u will know remember???
now how come nobody wants to look at the game but isntead is comparing statistics like branko lost to jordan and macedonia, ghalenoi did too.
the day we lost to jordan in azadi, not only jordan was much stronger and at its peak but we also created around 20 chances if i remember correctly. we were unlucky not one ball went in.
now wat about the syria game?? how many real chances did we create?
did u see our game? a stupid crossing the ball from anywhere on the field system for enayati and khatibi among the huge syrian defenders!
just look at the game, compare it with the jordan game and tell me if i disappointed u!
and while we are at it, lets see if ghalenoi can get the good results branko got like 2-2 against croatia or 5-2 against bosnia??
u really think ghalenoi WILL EVER after 5 years with TM will be able to get these 2 results with this current players, and knowledge of his??? :rolleyes:
no, ali jan, i was not hoping TM would lose so i would say "i told u so"
why would i wanna do that??? at the expense of my coutnry getting eliminated in the asian qualifiers!!!
people here "khodeshuno jer midadan" cos they were afraid iran would have a disaster performance in the worldcup?/
but guess wat, now iran is on the verge of having a disasterous performance in ASIAN QUALIFIERS!!!
when was the last time iran didnt qualify to asian cup!! more than 4 decades ago if im not mistaken.
hala begu hagh jer dadane khodamo nadaram!!!
i never said ghalenoi didnt take the blame.
but i have been following ghalenoi for 3 whole years cos he was my favortie clubs coach.
he always whined when he lost.
yes, this game, he blamed himself, but trust me, there is a difference when u accept the blame today when ur new and when u blame urself aftera year or so when u start getting bad results as well, the media gets pissed about u, critiques start stating their dis satisfication about u, etc.
i wanna see if ghalenoi will admit it was his fault a year from now or 2, if god forbid, we lose to a poor team. i can guarantee u 99% he wont!
besides, im definite 101% sure the reason ghalenoi even admitted himself was not because he was a professional or some ethical person, but only because he and haj agha maelli kohan always blamed branko of not accepting the blame, playing players out of position, choosing daei, etc.
if u noticed, ghalenoi has done everything the opposite of wat branko did.
people say he is not using kaabi because of lajbaazi with branko.
he didnt invite daei although u cant deny the fact that daei would have been more effective in todays game than that useless khatibi!
he didnt invite zandi while branko went all the way to germany and convicned him of it.
people here claim that ghalenoi is just trying to do wat branko didnt do.
SO i CLAIM, this too, is just one of those things which branko didnt do and so ghalenoi is making sure he does it, so that people will think, oh, he has integrity, he is not a wimp like branko!
YES SURE!! dream on amir khan!!
ur right that syria played a totally tight defensive game.
and yes, ghalenoi needs more time, and will be and should be given more time!
nobody said no, neither did i. i am supporting him, no matter wat and i have said it in the ghalenoi support therad as well.
however, remember, we are on the verge of getting knocked out in asian qualifiers, so we should keep an eye on this matter as well!
im not asking for ghalenoi's head, all im saying is, u people compare iran's game under branko with that of ghalenoi's and be ur own judge.
the next game is with korea anywayz. i just hope we dont lose with a goal difference of 3 or more!! seriously!!!
well, maybe branko was a wimp and didnt dare to paly without our legionnaires but atleast he made sure we don get disqualified in ASIAN QUALIFIERS!! :rolleyes:
Next, so u dont mind giving ghalenoi experience at the cost of asian cup huh??/
i guess we have totally different views then!
hehehehhee, its interesting that ur telling me about ariee haan cos each and every thread about arie haan,
1)first i have stated my disgust for him cos his main intention for coming to iran was to take over TM. mikhast az abe gelalud mahi begire.
2)he is not a great coach. he was a great player but not a great coach specially when people were saying ariee haan should become the next TM coach.
U dont believe me, u can ask any perspolis about it. maybe ali_vigh or someone or just search for it.
i am not a vatan furush, im not a khareji parast, im an admirer of TM, and my understanding of iranian football and non-football issues states that branko was the best iran could have currently. Thats it. why is it so hard for people to understand this??
U know, the problem is not that u were expecting more from me, the problem is u dont know me. u are telling me haan this, haan that, while i was the one in the football forum going against him and claiming he came to iran just to go to the worldcup with iran. once the worldcup was over, why would he wanna leave other offers for irans??
and one more thing, i will take any coach who WILL ATLEAST GET US TO ASIAN CUP NOW!! iranian or non-iranian doesnt matter.
we should keep a balance between the present and the future. u say an iranian coach who can atleast gain some experience for our future good, i say ok, BUT AS LONG AS WE DONT SACRIFICE OUR PRESENT FOR HIM!!
there is a fine thin line somewhere which makes sure we know wat we are doing.
If an iranian coach cant avoid a disaster,make him an assistant coach to a coach who can atleast guarantee us a sport in asian cup 2007. this way, we dont face a disaster, and our coach gets his experience at the same time!!
im sorry to disappoint ur expectations but i think u need to know me better before u make sure u have the right expectations from me.
P.S. dont even start about the offside goals in syria or the chances nekounam ork hatibi missed cos its ridiculous. if u wanna talk about missed chances, maybe i should remind u about hashemian's missed chance against mexico, teymourian against portugal, zandi's 1 on 1 with angola and daei's header wide over the empty angola goal or even the numerous chances iran had against jordan and macedonia including the 1 on 1 karimi had against macedonia.
yashar_fasihnia
08-18-2006, 11:28 AM
doctor jan, i understand wat ur trying to say, and u r right, and i know it too.
we shouldnt be expecting much from ghalenoi.
but then again doctor jan, at the expense of GETTING KNOCKED OUT IN THE ASIAN QUALIFIERS???
thats something i as an iranian cant buy!
a failure in the worldcup, i can live with,
but a failure in the ASIAN QUALIFIERS?? i dont think even u can live with!
:(
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.