View Full Version : WC Danger Men
princeofpersia1
12-22-2005, 12:07 PM
Germany - Ballack
Costa Rica - Wanchope
Poland - Frankowski
Ecuador - Delgado
England - Lampard
Paraguay - Santa Cruz
Trinidad - John
Sweden - Ibrahimovic
Argentina - Riquelme
Ivory coast - Drogba
Serbia & Montenegro - Krstajic
Holland - Van Nistelrooy
Mexico - Blanco
Iran - Karimi
Angola - Akwa
Portugal - Ronaldo
Italy - Totti
Ghana - Essien
USA - Adu
Czech Rep. - Nedved
Brazil - Ronaldinho
Croatia - Prso
Australia - Schwarzer
Japan - Ono
France - Zidane
Switzerland - Frei
South Korea - Park Ji-sung
Togo - Adebayor
Spain - Raul
Ukraine - Shevchenko
Tunisia - Trabelsi
Saudi Arabia - Al Montashari
Do you agree with all of these?
khabalood
12-22-2005, 12:28 PM
you should change it from Karimi to Mahdavikia. Even in the asia cup, Mahdavikia made a bigger impact. He had 8 assists to Karimis 5 goals.
princeofpersia1
12-22-2005, 01:44 PM
you should change it from Karimi to Mahdavikia. Even in the asia cup, Mahdavikia made a bigger impact. He had 8 assists to Karimis 5 goals.
Thats arguable , I understand your point . Mahdavikia is capable of sending beautiful through balls , but by the term danger men i'm not referring to the number of goals they can score , im reffering to the star player and the most threatening player . Which in my eyes is Karimi
khabalood
12-22-2005, 02:07 PM
well, your intitled to your opinion, but I think Mahdavikia is our star player and most threatening to the opposition.
Martin-Reza
12-22-2005, 03:18 PM
I'm afraid most teams have more than one dangerman.
princeofpersia1
12-22-2005, 07:20 PM
I'm afraid most teams have more than one dangerman.
You're right but i decided to just to pick one player because unfortunately for some teams like Brazil etc have players such as Adriano , Ronaldo , Kaka and Robinho etc who are all danger men.
Arashi_Washi
12-22-2005, 08:55 PM
USA wont even invite Adu for the world cup..
He is far from being invited to the squad really..
So thats 1 i dont agree on
Serbia i belive Kezman is the one to watch out for
Saudi Arabia its deffinatly their offensive weapon Al-Qatani
Spain its truly Torres who is the main man currently
Japan= Ono..Common the guy is been injured for what 5-6 months and is far from DANGERMAn...clearly it has to be Nakamura
Australias Dangerman is deffinatly Viduka or Kewell..NOT the goalii
Mexico Dangerman=Borgetti and thats it...Even though Blanco is dangerous Borgetti is their man
Argentina it has to be Crespo at the current moment
Paraguay wont have Santa cruz for the world as he will be injured..
Valdez is the man for them
I belive Poland dangerman HAS to be Smolarek
I would also say in England squad Rooney is the man
Well thats my opinions
Makaveli
12-22-2005, 09:33 PM
i think England should be Wayne Rooney, ive seen alotta players play from up close but he is just smoething else. Hasnt been someone like him since Maradona i dont think. Hes the driving force of the team. Iran needs someone like that
KasraKhan
12-23-2005, 03:27 AM
For the great footballing countries such as England, Germany, Brazil and Argentine, it is very hard to chose 1 danger man when they all have at least 3
Dr.shark
12-23-2005, 06:52 AM
Thats arguable , I understand your point . Mahdavikia is capable of sending beautiful through balls , but by the term danger men i'm not referring to the number of goals they can score , im reffering to the star player and the most threatening player . Which in my eyes is Karimi
I also see Mahdvikia as our star abouve star player because almost all our plays are started by him and he has been the man that has been playing in europian club since 98 unitl now and has been doing wonders for his club right now.
princeofpersia1
12-23-2005, 09:48 AM
I also see Mahdvikia as our star abouve star player because almost all our plays are started by him and he has been the man that has been playing in europian club since 98 unitl now and has been doing wonders for his club right now.
Did you watch the DFB Pokal game againt Bayern the other night , other than blocking that shot he was very sloppy and virtually all his attack for Hamburg were faliures. I've never seen him play like that , if he was more consistent i would think of him so much more.
khabalood
12-23-2005, 02:05 PM
well if you are speaking of consistency, I believe Mahdavikia is the more consistent of the two, and I think many on this board will agree with me. In fact I believe you also agree, which is why you wrote "I've never seen him play like that" :)
I think the danger man for Mexico is Borgetti!!
gol_kuchik
12-23-2005, 08:51 PM
This is just like out, we are trying to discuss WC danger men and the
focus has changed to who is better on our own side. Baba jan focus
on the topic. There is so much chance to discuss our only players
elsewhere.
Now the question: Who is the most dangerous player among our
opponents and why?
Haf3z
12-25-2005, 04:26 PM
I'm afraid most teams have more than one dangerman.
So true!
P.Nima
12-25-2005, 04:53 PM
beautiful balls
I agree with you on that.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.